- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- DEFENDER P17 vs TK20R V2.0
Acebeam DEFENDER P17 vs Fenix TK20R V2.0
What DEFENDER P17 does better (3) and where TK20R V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Brightness & throw7.5
9.4Battery & charging5.6
5.8Build & durability5.9
7.9Light quality7.9
5.9Features5.9
Why is DEFENDER P17 better than TK20R V2.0?
- Maximum runtime480 h vs 48 h10×
- Maximum output4,900 lm vs 3,000 lm+63%
- Weight154 g vs 204 g+32%
Why is TK20R V2.0 better than DEFENDER P17?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)172 m vs 475 m2.8×
- Peak beam intensity7,396 cd vs 56,410 cd7.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,900 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,396 cd | 56,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 172 m | 475 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 480 h | 48 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 1.5 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 154 g | 204 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
