- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- DEFENDER P17 vs TK22 TAC
Acebeam DEFENDER P17 vs Fenix TK22 TAC
What DEFENDER P17 does better (2) and where TK22 TAC wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Brightness & throw7.9
9.4Battery & charging4.9
5.8Build & durability6.4
5.9Features5.9
Why is DEFENDER P17 better than TK22 TAC?
- Maximum runtime480 h vs 49.5 h9.7×
- Maximum output4,900 lm vs 2,800 lm+75%
Why is TK22 TAC better than DEFENDER P17?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)172 m vs 540 m3.1×
- Peak beam intensity7,396 cd vs 72,900 cd9.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,900 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,396 cd | 72,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 172 m | 540 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70 | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 480 h | 49.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 1.5 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 154 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 26 mm |
| Weight | 154 g | 156 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
