- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs EC35
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Acebeam EC35
What E10 2.0 does better (0) and where EC35 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is E10 2.0 better than EC35?
E10 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is EC35 better than E10 2.0?
EC35 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-L |
| LED maker | Cree | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 106 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
