- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs UC20
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Acebeam UC20
What E10 2.0 does better (4) and where UC20 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is E10 2.0 better than UC20?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 63 h+90%
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,000 lm+20%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 220 m+10%
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 12,100 cd+20%
Why is UC20 better than E10 2.0?
UC20 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 12,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 220 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 2 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SFT-25R |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 63 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 106 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Tail switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
