- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs LD35
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Imalent LD35
What E10 2.0 does better (0) and where LD35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is E10 2.0 better than LD35?
E10 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is LD35 better than E10 2.0?
- Peak beam intensity14,520 cd vs 26,900 cd+85%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m vs 328 m+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | 26,900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | 328 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 106 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
