How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E10 2.0 vs FlatTac X2

Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Klarus FlatTac X2

What E10 2.0 does better (1) and where FlatTac X2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam E10 2.0
Acebeam · 2026E10 2.0
6.8Score
1 advantage≈ $60
Higher score
vs
Klarus FlatTac X2
Klarus · 2026FlatTac X2
1 advantage≈ $50
4.3Brightness & throw7.3

Why is E10 2.0 better than FlatTac X2?

  1. RechargeableYes · FlatTac X2: No

Why is FlatTac X2 better than E10 2.0?

  1. Maximum output1,200 lm vs 3,000 lm2.5×
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam E10 2.0Acebeam E10 2.0≈ $606.8
Light output
Maximum output1,200 lm3,000 lm
Peak beam intensity14,520 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)241 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED makerCree—
Colour temperature—3,000K
Battery & charging
Battery16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A—
Maximum runtime120 h—
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m—
Body materialAluminiumStainless steel
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Size & weight
Length / height88 mm—
Head diameter / width40 mm—
Body diameter / depth24.5 mm—
Weight106 g—
Modes & features
SwitchSide switch—
StrobeYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare