- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E10 2.0 vs E8
Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Wuben E8
What E10 2.0 does better (1) and where E8 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is E10 2.0 better than E8?
- Maximum runtime120 h vs 36 h3.3×
Why is E8 better than E10 2.0?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,300 lm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,520 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 241 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | AA |
| Maximum runtime | 120 h | 36 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 88 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 24.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 106 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| UV light | — | Yes |
