- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC50 GEN Ⅲ vs HT18R V2.0
Acebeam EC50 GEN Ⅲ vs Fenix HT18R V2.0
What EC50 GEN Ⅲ does better (1) and where HT18R V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw8.9
Why is EC50 GEN Ⅲ better than HT18R V2.0?
- Maximum output3,850 lm vs 3,700 lm+4%
Why is HT18R V2.0 better than EC50 GEN Ⅲ?
HT18R V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,850 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 302,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 1,100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.2 | Luminus SFT-90 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 26650 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 6,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 87 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 1.5 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 358 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Side switch |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
