- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC50 GEN Ⅲ vs MH40 Pro
Acebeam EC50 GEN Ⅲ vs Nitecore MH40 Pro
What EC50 GEN Ⅲ does better (1) and where MH40 Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Brightness & throw9.0
Why is EC50 GEN Ⅲ better than MH40 Pro?
- Maximum output3,850 lm vs 3,500 lm+10%
Why is MH40 Pro better than EC50 GEN Ⅲ?
MH40 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,850 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 422,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 1,300 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.2 | NiteLab UHi 40 MAX |
| LED maker | Cree | NiteLab |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 26650 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 10,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 62 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Switch | Side switch | Remote pressure switch |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
