- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC90 vs L35 2.0
Acebeam EC90 vs Acebeam L35 2.0
What EC90 does better (0) and where L35 2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is EC90 better than L35 2.0?
EC90 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is L35 2.0 better than EC90?
- Maximum output4,300 lm vs 5,000 lm+16%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)573 m vs 650 m+13%
- Peak beam intensity82,082 cd vs 105,620 cd+29%
- Maximum runtime260 h vs 288 h+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,300 lm | 5,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 82,082 cd | 105,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 573 m | 650 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 360 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70.3 HI |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | 288 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 137.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.8 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
