- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC90 vs C61
Acebeam EC90 vs Nextorch C61
What EC90 does better (3) and where C61 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
EC90C61
| EC90 | C61 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 137.5 mm | 165 mm | −27.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 35 mm | +5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.8 mm | 28.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EC90 better than C61?
- Maximum output4,300 lm vs 3,500 lm+23%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m vs 1 m+50%
Why is C61 better than EC90?
- Maximum runtime260 h vs 500 h+92%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,300 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 82,082 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 573 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 360 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | 500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 137.5 mm | 165 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 35 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.8 mm | 28.5 mm |
| Weight | — | 175 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | Side switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
