- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- EC90 vs Seeker 4 IPX8
Acebeam EC90 vs Olight Seeker 4 IPX8
What EC90 does better (3) and where Seeker 4 IPX8 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Brightness & throw8.0
Why is EC90 better than Seeker 4 IPX8?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)573 m vs 400 m+43%
- Maximum output4,300 lm vs 3,100 lm+39%
- RechargeableYes · Seeker 4 IPX8: No
Why is Seeker 4 IPX8 better than EC90?
Seeker 4 IPX8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,300 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 82,082 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 573 m | 400 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 360 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | — | Stainless steel |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 137.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.8 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
