- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H15 2.0 vs HT50
Acebeam H15 2.0 vs Imalent HT50
What H15 2.0 does better (0) and where HT50 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is H15 2.0 better than HT50?
H15 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HT50 better than H15 2.0?
- Maximum output2,800 lm vs 3,000 lm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 25,280 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 318 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP50.3 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 350 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 111.1 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
