- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H15 2.0 vs Hc35
Acebeam H15 2.0 vs Nitecore Hc35
What H15 2.0 does better (1) and where Hc35 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is H15 2.0 better than Hc35?
- Maximum output2,800 lm vs 2,700 lm+4%
Why is Hc35 better than H15 2.0?
Hc35 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 2,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 4,490 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 134 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion, 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 1,200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 111.1 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
