- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H15 2.0 vs HC65 MCT
Acebeam H15 2.0 vs Nitecore HC65 MCT
What H15 2.0 does better (1) and where HC65 MCT wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is H15 2.0 better than HC65 MCT?
- Maximum output2,800 lm vs 2,000 lm+40%
Why is HC65 MCT better than H15 2.0?
HC65 MCT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 16,709 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 258 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 8 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 98 |
| Colour temperature | — | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 154 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Magnesium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 111.1 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 146 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
