- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H15 2.0 vs HC65M V2.0
Acebeam H15 2.0 vs Nitecore HC65M V2.0
What H15 2.0 does better (1) and where HC65M V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Brightness & throw8.3
5.9Features5.9
Why is H15 2.0 better than HC65M V2.0?
- Maximum output2,800 lm vs 1,750 lm+60%
Why is HC65M V2.0 better than H15 2.0?
HC65M V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,800 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 165 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 3 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 110 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 111.1 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
