How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. H16 vs NU25 MCT UL

Acebeam H16 vs Nitecore NU25 MCT UL

What H16 does better (2) and where NU25 MCT UL wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam H16
Acebeam · 2024H16
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $45
vs
Nitecore NU25 MCT UL
Nitecore · 2025NU25 MCT UL
6.7Score
2 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
4.6Brightness & throw5.1
4.6Battery & charging3.5
8.2Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9

Why is H16 better than NU25 MCT UL?

  1. Maximum output650 lm vs 400 lm+62%
  2. Maximum runtime58 h vs 45 h+29%

Why is NU25 MCT UL better than H16?

  1. Peak beam intensity1,849 cd vs 4,360 cd2.4×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)86 m vs 132 m+53%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam H16Acebeam H16≈ $455.9
Light output
Maximum output650 lm400 lm
Peak beam intensity1,849 cd4,360 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)86 m132 m
Runtime at maximum output45 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterNichia 519A—
LED makerNichia—
Colour rendering (CRI)90—
Colour temperature—3,000K
Adjustable colour temperature—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery14500 Li-ion, AA—
Number of batteries—1
Battery capacity—700 mAh
Maximum runtime58 h45 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C charging—Yes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP66
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Submersible to—2 m
Body material—Plastic / polymer
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Pocket clipYes—
Modes & features
SOS / beaconYesYes
Red light—Yes
Lockout—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare