- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H17 2.0 vs eStar
Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Nextorch eStar
What H17 2.0 does better (4) and where eStar wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is H17 2.0 better than eStar?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,300 lm+54%
- Maximum runtime170 h vs 115 h+48%
- Weight73 g vs 87 g+19%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is eStar better than H17 2.0?
- Peak beam intensity4,100 cd vs 10,506 cd2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)128 m vs 205 m+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,100 cd | 10,506 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 128 m | 205 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 170 h | 115 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | 63 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 46 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 36 mm |
| Weight | 73 g | 87 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
