- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H18 vs HM71R V2.0
Acebeam H18 vs Fenix HM71R V2.0
What H18 does better (3) and where HM71R V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Brightness & throw9.4
9.0Battery & charging9.6
9.5Build & durability6.9
5.9Features5.9
Why is H18 better than HM71R V2.0?
- Weight70 g vs 220 g3.1×
- Maximum output4,000 lm vs 3,500 lm+14%
- Battery capacity6,400 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+16%
Why is HM71R V2.0 better than H18?
HM71R V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,000 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 18,910 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 275 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SFT-60 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 4 | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 6,400 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 337 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 119.2 mm | 111.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 50 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 53.4 mm |
| Weight | 70 g | 220 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
