- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H30 vs HP25R V2.0
Acebeam H30 vs Fenix HP25R V2.0
What H30 does better (2) and where HP25R V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Brightness & throw9.0
8.9Battery & charging9.2
6.8Build & durability4.9
8.3Light quality8.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is H30 better than HP25R V2.0?
- Maximum output4,000 lm vs 1,600 lm2.5×
- Weight80 g vs 238 g3×
Why is HP25R V2.0 better than H30?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)118 m vs 228 m+93%
- Peak beam intensity3,500 cd vs 13,000 cd3.7×
- Maximum runtime200 h vs 400 h2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,500 cd | 13,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 118 m | 228 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 120 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.2 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Cree | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 5,700K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 200 h | 400 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 89.4 mm | 60 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 47 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 33 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 238 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| UV light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
