- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H35 vs HM61R V3.0
Acebeam H35 vs Fenix HM61R V3.0
What H35 does better (1) and where HM61R V3.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Brightness & throw8.3
9.6Build & durability7.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is H35 better than HM61R V3.0?
- Maximum output2,600 lm vs 1,800 lm+44%
Why is HM61R V3.0 better than H35?
- Maximum runtime216 h vs 300 h+39%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,600 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 9,510 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 195 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 216 h | 300 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 87 mm | 105.4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 38 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 51 mm |
| Weight | — | 168 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
