How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. H35 vs HM71R V2.0

Acebeam H35 vs Fenix HM71R V2.0

What H35 does better (0) and where HM71R V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam H35
Acebeam · 2025H35
9.6Score
0 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Fenix HM71R V2.0
Fenix · 2026HM71R V2.0
9.3Score
2 advantages≈ $125
9.4Brightness & throw9.4
9.6Build & durability6.9
5.9Features5.9

Why is H35 better than HM71R V2.0?

H35 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is HM71R V2.0 better than H35?

  1. Maximum output2,600 lm vs 3,500 lm+35%
  2. Maximum runtime216 h vs 337 h+56%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam H35Acebeam H35≈ $1009.6
Fenix HM71R V2.0Fenix HM71R V2.0≈ $1259.3
Light output
Maximum output2,600 lm3,500 lm
Peak beam intensity—18,910 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—275 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitter—Luminus SFT-60
LED maker—Luminus
Number of LEDs—2
Colour temperature—6,500K
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity—5,500 mAh
Maximum runtime216 h337 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—Yes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)—2 m
Body material—Aluminium
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clip—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height87 mm111.5 mm
Head diameter / width—50 mm
Body diameter / depth—53.4 mm
Weight—220 g
Modes & features
Switch—Rotary / scroll wheel
SOS / beaconYes—
Red lightYesYes
Lockout—Yes
Mode memory—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare