- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs HM65R
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Fenix HM65R
What H50 2.0 does better (3) and where HM65R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is H50 2.0 better than HM65R?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,400 lm+43%
- Weight94 g vs 96 g+2%
- Brightness levels5 vs 4+25%
Why is HM65R better than H50 2.0?
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 280 h7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 163 m+16%
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 6,640 cd+34%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 6,640 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 163 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Cree XM-L2 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | 5,800K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 280 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Magnesium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 55 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 40 mm |
| Weight | 94 g | 96 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 4 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
