- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs HM65R-T V2.0
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Fenix HM65R-T V2.0
What H50 2.0 does better (2) and where HM65R-T V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Brightness & throw7.8
3.7Battery & charging8.6
8.3Build & durability7.6
8.9Light quality5.7
Why is H50 2.0 better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+25%
- Weight94 g vs 140 g+49%
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than H50 2.0?
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 300 h7.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 170 m+21%
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 7,220 cd+45%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 7,220 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 170 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | 6,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 300 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | — |
| Weight | 94 g | 140 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
