- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs Hc35
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Nitecore Hc35
What H50 2.0 does better (2) and where Hc35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is H50 2.0 better than Hc35?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 134 m+5%
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 4,490 cd+11%
Why is Hc35 better than H50 2.0?
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 1,200 h30×
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 2,700 lm+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 2,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 4,490 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 134 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion, 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 1,200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | No |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | — |
| Weight | 94 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
