- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs HC65 UHE
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Nitecore HC65 UHE
What H50 2.0 does better (1) and where HC65 UHE wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is H50 2.0 better than HC65 UHE?
- Weight94 g vs 152 g+62%
Why is HC65 UHE better than H50 2.0?
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 12,293 cd2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 222 m+57%
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 82 h2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 12,293 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 222 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | 8 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 82 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | — |
| Weight | 94 g | 152 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
