- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs UT32
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Nitecore UT32
What H50 2.0 does better (3) and where UT32 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is H50 2.0 better than UT32?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,100 lm+82%
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 18 h2.2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is UT32 better than H50 2.0?
- Weight94 g vs 82 g+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 18 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | — |
| Weight | 94 g | 82 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
