- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- H50 2.0 vs Swift RL
Acebeam H50 2.0 vs Petzl Swift RL
What H50 2.0 does better (3) and where Swift RL wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is H50 2.0 better than Swift RL?
- Maximum output2,000 lm vs 1,100 lm+82%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Weight94 g vs 110 g+17%
Why is Swift RL better than H50 2.0?
- Maximum runtime40 h vs 100 h2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)141 m vs 155 m+10%
- Peak beam intensity4,968 cd vs 6,010 cd+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,000 lm | 1,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,968 cd | 6,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 141 m | 155 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 240 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 3 | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 2,350 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 40 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 5 h |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 85 mm | — |
| Weight | 94 g | 110 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
