- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L16 2.0 vs E52D
Acebeam L16 2.0 vs Nextorch E52D
What L16 2.0 does better (0) and where E52D wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is L16 2.0 better than E52D?
L16 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is E52D better than L16 2.0?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 3,700 lm+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 19,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 280 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | — | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 30 mm |
| Weight | — | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |









