- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L18 vs TK22 V2.0
Acebeam L18 vs Fenix TK22 V2.0
What L18 does better (2) and where TK22 V2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
L18TK22 V2.0
| L18 | TK22 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 154 mm | 150 mm | +4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52.2 mm | 40 mm | +12.2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is L18 better than TK22 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,000 m vs 405 m2.5×
- Peak beam intensity250,000 cd vs 41,010 cd6.1×
Why is TK22 V2.0 better than L18?
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 1,600 lm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 250,000 cd | 41,010 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,000 m | 405 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | — | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 154 mm | 150 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52.2 mm | 40 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | — | 150 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
