- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L18 vs WF30RE Intrinsically Safe
Acebeam L18 vs Fenix WF30RE Intrinsically Safe
What L18 does better (3) and where WF30RE Intrinsically Safe wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Brightness & throw2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
L18WF30RE Intrinsically Safe
| L18 | WF30RE Intrinsically Safe | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 154 mm | 150.5 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52.2 mm | 34 mm | +18.2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 28 mm | −2.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is L18 better than WF30RE Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 280 lm5.4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,000 m vs 170 m5.9×
- Peak beam intensity250,000 cd vs 7,220 cd34.6×
Why is WF30RE Intrinsically Safe better than L18?
WF30RE Intrinsically Safe has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 280 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 250,000 cd | 7,220 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,000 m | 170 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,800K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | — | 120 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 154 mm | 150.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 52.2 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 28 mm |
| Weight | — | 215 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
