- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- L19 2.0 vs HT18
Acebeam L19 2.0 vs Fenix HT18
What L19 2.0 does better (4) and where HT18 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
L19 2.0HT18
| L19 2.0 | HT18 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 163.8 mm | 184 mm | −20.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 68 mm | −8 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 26 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 220 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is L19 2.0 better than HT18?
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 1,500 lm+47%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,080 m vs 925 m+17%
- Peak beam intensity291,600 cd vs 213,910 cd+36%
- Weight205 g vs 220 g+7%
Why is HT18 better than L19 2.0?
- Maximum runtime47 h vs 61 h+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 291,600 cd | 213,910 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,080 m | 925 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-40 | Luminus SFT-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 47 h | 61 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 163.8 mm | 184 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 68 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | 26 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 220 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
