How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,158 models · updated Oct 24, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. P16 2.0 vs Bear WRG

Acebeam P16 2.0 vs Armytek Bear WRG

What P16 2.0 does better (0) and where Bear WRG wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam P16 2.0
Acebeam · 2025P16 2.0
7.7Score
0 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Armytek Bear WRG
Armytek · 2025Bear WRG
7.1Score
1 advantage≈ $90
6.4Build & durability6.4
5.9Features5.9

Why is P16 2.0 better than Bear WRG?

P16 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Bear WRG better than P16 2.0?

  1. Weight169 g vs 135 g+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam P16 2.0Acebeam P16 2.0≈ $1007.7
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm—
Peak beam intensity73,712 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)543 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-42R—
LED makerLuminus—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ionBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity3,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime30 h—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m—
Body materialAluminium—
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height136.3 mm—
Head diameter / width32 mm—
Body diameter / depth25 mm—
Weight169 g135 g
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
Red light—Yes
Colours—Green, Red, White, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare