- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- P16 2.0 vs PD35R ACE
Acebeam P16 2.0 vs Fenix PD35R ACE
What P16 2.0 does better (4) and where PD35R ACE wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
P16 2.0PD35R ACE
| P16 2.0 | PD35R ACE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | 140.5 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 26.5 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | 23.6 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 145 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P16 2.0 better than PD35R ACE?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 2,000 lm+50%
- Peak beam intensity73,712 cd vs 36,100 cd2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)543 m vs 380 m+43%
- Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m vs 1 m+50%
Why is PD35R ACE better than P16 2.0?
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 720 h24×
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+33%
- Weight169 g vs 145 g+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 73,712 cd | 36,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 543 m | 380 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | Luminus SFT-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 720 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | 140.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 26.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | 23.6 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 145 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
