- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- P16 2.0 vs TK05R
Acebeam P16 2.0 vs Fenix TK05R
What P16 2.0 does better (4) and where TK05R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
P16 2.0TK05R
| P16 2.0 | TK05R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | 115 mm | +21.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 32 mm | = |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | 23.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 124 g | +45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P16 2.0 better than TK05R?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,000 lm3×
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 14.5 h2.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)543 m vs 450 m+21%
- Peak beam intensity73,712 cd vs 50,620 cd+46%
Why is TK05R better than P16 2.0?
- Weight169 g vs 124 g+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 73,712 cd | 50,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 543 m | 450 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | Osram CSLPM1.TG |
| LED maker | Luminus | Osram |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18350 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 14.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | 115 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 124 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
