- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- P16 2.0 vs Davinci 8000
Acebeam P16 2.0 vs NEBO Davinci 8000
What P16 2.0 does better (3) and where Davinci 8000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Brightness & throw7.0
4.1Battery & charging4.8
6.4Build & durability2.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is P16 2.0 better than Davinci 8000?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)543 m vs 206 m2.6×
- Weight169 g vs 527 g3.1×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Why is Davinci 8000 better than P16 2.0?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 8,000 lm2.7×
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 45 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 8,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 73,712 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 543 m | 206 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 45 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 169 g | 527 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
