- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Pokelit vs TAC 700
Acebeam Pokelit vs Energizer TAC 700
What Pokelit does better (1) and where TAC 700 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PokelitTAC 700
| Pokelit | TAC 700 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 94.8 mm | 120 mm | −25.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 18.2 mm | 31 mm | −12.8 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 147 g | −92 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pokelit better than TAC 700?
- Weight55 g vs 147 g2.7×
Why is TAC 700 better than Pokelit?
- Maximum output550 lm vs 700 lm+27%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)86 m vs 100 m+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 550 lm | 700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,849 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 86 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 219F | — |
| LED maker | Nichia | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 14500 Li-ion, AA, C | CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 94.8 mm | 120 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 18.2 mm | 31 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 55 g | 147 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
