- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Pokelit vs E12 V3.0
Acebeam Pokelit vs Fenix E12 V3.0
What Pokelit does better (4) and where E12 V3.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PokelitE12 V3.0
| Pokelit | E12 V3.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 94.8 mm | 81.5 mm | +13.3 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 18.2 mm | 19.3 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.8 mm | 17.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 54 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pokelit better than E12 V3.0?
- Maximum output550 lm vs 200 lm2.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)86 m vs 78 m+10%
- Peak beam intensity1,849 cd vs 1,520 cd+22%
- RechargeableYes · E12 V3.0: No
Why is E12 V3.0 better than Pokelit?
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 100 h+72%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 550 lm | 200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,849 cd | 1,520 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 86 m | 78 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 219F | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Nichia | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 4,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 14500 Li-ion, AA, C | AA |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Can tail-stand | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 94.8 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 18.2 mm | 19.3 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.8 mm | 17.4 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 54 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
