How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Pokelit vs WF05E Intrinsically Safe

Acebeam Pokelit vs Fenix WF05E Intrinsically Safe

What Pokelit does better (3) and where WF05E Intrinsically Safe wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam Pokelit
Acebeam · 2022Pokelit
4.9Score
3 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
vs
Fenix WF05E Intrinsically Safe
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ $35
2.6Brightness & throw2.2
9.6Build & durability9.5
2.6Light quality2.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

PokelitWF05E Intrinsically Safe
18.2 × 94.817.819 × 134.514.9
PokelitWF05E Intrinsically SafeDifference
Length / height94.8 mm134.5 mm−39.7 mm
Head diameter / width18.2 mm19 mm−0.8 mm
Body diameter / depth17.8 mm14.9 mm+2.9 mm
Weight55 g37 g+18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pokelit better than WF05E Intrinsically Safe?

  1. Maximum output550 lm vs 85 lm6.5×
  2. Peak beam intensity1,849 cd vs 730 cd2.5×
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)86 m vs 54 m+59%

Why is WF05E Intrinsically Safe better than Pokelit?

  1. Weight55 g vs 37 g+49%
  2. Maximum runtime58 h vs 80 h+38%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam PokelitAcebeam Pokelit≈ $354.9
Light output
Maximum output550 lm85 lm
Peak beam intensity1,849 cd730 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)86 m54 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterNichia 219FCree XP-G2
LED makerNichiaCree
Battery & charging
Battery14500 Li-ion, AA, CAAA
Maximum runtime58 h80 h
RechargeableYes—
USB-C chargingYes—
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Pocket clip—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height94.8 mm134.5 mm
Head diameter / width18.2 mm19 mm
Body diameter / depth17.8 mm14.9 mm
Weight55 g37 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels33
SwitchTail switchRotary / scroll wheel
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare