- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Pokelit vs WF05E Intrinsically Safe
Acebeam Pokelit vs Fenix WF05E Intrinsically Safe
What Pokelit does better (3) and where WF05E Intrinsically Safe wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Brightness & throw2.3
9.7Build & durability9.5
2.6Light quality2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
PokelitWF05E Intrinsically Safe
| Pokelit | WF05E Intrinsically Safe | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 94.8 mm | 134.5 mm | −39.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 18.2 mm | 19 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.8 mm | 14.9 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 37 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pokelit better than WF05E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output550 lm vs 85 lm6.5×
- Peak beam intensity1,849 cd vs 730 cd2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)86 m vs 54 m+59%
Why is WF05E Intrinsically Safe better than Pokelit?
- Weight55 g vs 37 g+49%
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 80 h+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 550 lm | 85 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,849 cd | 730 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 86 m | 54 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 219F | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | Nichia | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 14500 Li-ion, AA, C | AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 94.8 mm | 134.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 18.2 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.8 mm | 14.9 mm |
| Weight | 55 g | 37 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | 3 |
| Switch | Tail switch | Rotary / scroll wheel |
