- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- T37 vs E52D
Acebeam T37 vs Nextorch E52D
What T37 does better (4) and where E52D wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is T37 better than E52D?
- Peak beam intensity48,400 cd vs 19,600 cd2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)440 m vs 280 m+57%
- Maximum output4,000 lm vs 3,700 lm+8%
- Maximum runtime72 h vs 60 h+20%
Why is E52D better than T37?
E52D has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 4,000 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 48,400 cd | 19,600 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 440 m | 280 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,800 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 72 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 30 mm |
| Weight | — | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch, Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
