How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TAC 2AA vs L1

Acebeam TAC 2AA vs Wuben L1

What TAC 2AA does better (1) and where L1 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam TAC 2AA
Acebeam · 2024TAC 2AA
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $50
vs
Wuben L1
Wuben · 2025L1
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
4.3Brightness & throw5.9
7.6Battery & charging7.5
6.8Build & durability6.8
7.9Light quality7.1

Why is TAC 2AA better than L1?

  1. Maximum runtime94 h vs 90 h+4%

Why is L1 better than TAC 2AA?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)181 m vs 350 m+93%
  2. Peak beam intensity8,190 cd vs 30,620 cd3.7×
  3. Maximum output1,600 lm vs 2,000 lm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam TAC 2AAAcebeam TAC 2AA≈ $506.7
Wuben L1Wuben L1≈ $558.0
Light output
Maximum output1,600 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity8,190 cd30,620 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)181 m350 m
Runtime at maximum output180 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-25R—
LED makerLuminusOsram
Colour rendering (CRI)—90
Battery & charging
BatteryAA—
Maximum runtime94 h90 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Power bank function—Yes
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m1.5 m
Body materialAluminium—
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clipYes—
Can tail-standYes—
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchTail switchTail switch
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare