How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TAC 2AA vs L3

Acebeam TAC 2AA vs Wuben L3

What TAC 2AA does better (1) and where L3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam TAC 2AA
Acebeam · 2024TAC 2AA
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Wuben L3
Wuben · 2025L3
6.4Score
4 advantages≈ $40
4.3Brightness & throw5.2
7.6Battery & charging8.3
6.8Build & durability4.6
5.9Features5.9

Why is TAC 2AA better than L3?

  1. Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m vs 1 m+50%

Why is L3 better than TAC 2AA?

  1. Maximum output1,600 lm vs 3,000 lm+88%
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)181 m vs 226 m+25%
  3. Peak beam intensity8,190 cd vs 12,770 cd+56%
  4. Maximum runtime94 h vs 120 h+28%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam TAC 2AAAcebeam TAC 2AA≈ $506.7
Wuben L3Wuben L3≈ $406.4
Light output
Maximum output1,600 lm3,000 lm
Peak beam intensity8,190 cd12,770 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)181 m226 m
Runtime at maximum output180 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-25R—
LED makerLuminus—
Battery & charging
BatteryAA—
Battery capacity—4,800 mAh
Maximum runtime94 h120 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m1 m
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Pocket clipYes—
Can tail-standYes—
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchTail switch—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYesYes
SOS / beacon—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare