- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC AA 2.0 vs SW05R
Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Fenix SW05R
What TAC AA 2.0 does better (4) and where SW05R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Brightness & throw2.1
4.7Battery & charging3.7
6.5Build & durability9.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than SW05R?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 150 lm6.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m vs 39 m9.2×
- Peak beam intensity32,400 cd vs 380 cd85.3×
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 49 h+18%
Why is SW05R better than TAC AA 2.0?
SW05R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 150 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 32,400 cd | 380 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 360 m | 39 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 45 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 700 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 49 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 69 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 29 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 16 mm |
| Weight | — | 55 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
