How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TAC AA 2.0 vs C7 Classic

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Ledlenser C7 Classic

What TAC AA 2.0 does better (1) and where C7 Classic wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0
Acebeam · 2025TAC AA 2.0
6.1Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
vs
Ledlenser C7 Classic
Ledlenser · 2025C7 Classic
0 advantages≈ $50
5.5Brightness & throw3.2

Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than C7 Classic?

  1. Maximum output1,000 lm vs 450 lm2.2×

Why is C7 Classic better than TAC AA 2.0?

C7 Classic has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm450 lm
Peak beam intensity32,400 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m—
Runtime at maximum output45 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-25R—
LED makerLuminus—
Colour temperature6,500K6,000K
Battery & charging
BatteryAAAAA
Maximum runtime58 h—
Rechargeable—No
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Submersible to2 m—
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m—
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Modes & features
Brightness levels4—
SwitchTail switch—
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare