- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC vs MH11
Acebeam TAC vs Nitecore MH11
What TAC does better (1) and where MH11 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is TAC better than MH11?
- Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m vs 1 m+50%
Why is MH11 better than TAC?
MH11 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 8,930 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 189 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 14500 Li-ion, AA, C | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | — | 250 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 104.6 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
