- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Terminator M2 vs Seeker 4 IPX8
Acebeam Terminator M2 vs Olight Seeker 4 IPX8
What Terminator M2 does better (3) and where Seeker 4 IPX8 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
8.5Brightness & throw8.0
Why is Terminator M2 better than Seeker 4 IPX8?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)500 m vs 400 m+25%
- Maximum output3,200 lm vs 3,100 lm+3%
- RechargeableYes · Seeker 4 IPX8: No
Why is Seeker 4 IPX8 better than Terminator M2?
Seeker 4 IPX8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,200 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 62,500 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 500 m | 400 m |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | — | Stainless steel |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 95.4 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Black |
