How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TK18 vs C7 V2.0

Acebeam TK18 vs Fenix C7 V2.0

What TK18 does better (0) and where C7 V2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam TK18
Acebeam · 2026TK18
0 advantages≈ $100
vs
Fenix C7 V2.0
Fenix · 2026C7 V2.0
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $80
Higher score
7.3Brightness & throw8.3

Why is TK18 better than C7 V2.0?

TK18 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is C7 V2.0 better than TK18?

  1. Maximum output3,000 lm vs 3,300 lm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam TK18Acebeam TK18≈ $100
Fenix C7 V2.0Fenix C7 V2.0≈ $808.2
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm3,300 lm
Peak beam intensity—82,660 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—575 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitter—Luminus SFT-70
LED maker—Luminus
Colour temperature—6,500K
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion21700 Li-ion
Maximum runtime—79 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—Yes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Body materialCopperAluminium
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Size & weight
Length / height—150.6 mm
Head diameter / width—40 mm
Body diameter / depth—27.5 mm
Weight—256 g
Modes & features
Strobe—Yes
SOS / beacon—Yes
Lockout—Yes
Mode memory—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare