How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. UC25 vs Bear WRG

Acebeam UC25 vs Armytek Bear WRG

What UC25 does better (0) and where Bear WRG wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam UC25
Acebeam · 2025UC25
6.0Score
0 advantages≈ $110
vs
Armytek Bear WRG
Armytek · 2025Bear WRG
7.1Score
1 advantage≈ $90
Higher score
4.6Build & durability6.4
5.9Features5.9

Why is UC25 better than Bear WRG?

UC25 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Bear WRG better than UC25?

  1. Weight138 g vs 135 g+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam UC25Acebeam UC25≈ $1106.0
Light output
Maximum output3,100 lm—
Peak beam intensity7,569 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)174 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery—Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Maximum runtime72 h—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP65—
Water protection (IPx)IPx5—
Body materialAluminium—
Size & weight
Weight138 g135 g
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches, Rotary / scroll wheel—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)Yes—
StrobeYes—
Red light—Yes
UV lightYes—
Colours—Green, Red, White, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare