How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. UC25 vs TK17

Acebeam UC25 vs Fenix TK17

What UC25 does better (2) and where TK17 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam UC25
Acebeam · 2025UC25
5.1Score
2 advantages≈ $110
vs
Fenix TK17
Fenix · 2025TK17
7.4Score
4 advantages≈ $105
Higher score
4.6Brightness & throw6.4
6.5Battery & charging7.1
3.7Build & durability6.1
5.9Features5.9

Why is UC25 better than TK17?

  1. Weight138 g vs 197 g+43%
  2. Maximum runtime72 h vs 60 h+20%

Why is TK17 better than UC25?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)174 m vs 330 m+90%
  2. Peak beam intensity7,569 cd vs 27,220 cd3.6×
  3. Water protection (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
  4. Maximum output3,100 lm vs 3,600 lm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam UC25Acebeam UC25≈ $1105.1
Fenix TK17Fenix TK17≈ $1057.4
Light output
Maximum output3,100 lm3,600 lm
Peak beam intensity7,569 cd27,220 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)174 m330 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitter—Cree XHP50
LED maker—Cree
Colour temperature6,500K5,700K
Battery & charging
Battery—21700 Li-ion
Battery capacity—6,000 mAh
Maximum runtime72 h60 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP65IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx5IPx8
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Size & weight
Length / height—148.5 mm
Head diameter / width—36 mm
Body diameter / depth—25.4 mm
Weight138 g197 g
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches, Rotary / scroll wheelDual switches
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)YesYes
StrobeYesYes
UV lightYes—
Mode memory—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare