- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- UC25 vs Davinci 8000
Acebeam UC25 vs NEBO Davinci 8000
What UC25 does better (3) and where Davinci 8000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Brightness & throw7.0
6.7Battery & charging4.8
4.1Build & durability2.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is UC25 better than Davinci 8000?
- Weight138 g vs 527 g3.8×
- Maximum runtime72 h vs 45 h+60%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is Davinci 8000 better than UC25?
- Maximum output3,100 lm vs 8,000 lm2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)174 m vs 206 m+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,100 lm | 8,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,569 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 174 m | 206 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Maximum runtime | 72 h | 45 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP65 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 138 g | 527 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches, Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| UV light | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
